{"id":1897,"date":"2018-09-21T07:15:55","date_gmt":"2018-09-21T07:15:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/betcentral.onpressidium.com\/?p=1897"},"modified":"2023-04-26T08:50:08","modified_gmt":"2023-04-26T06:50:08","slug":"should-cape-town-city-be-considered-one-of-the-top-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/machibet777-app.com\/news\/should-cape-town-city-be-considered-one-of-the-top-4\/","title":{"rendered":"SHOULD CAPE TOWN CITY BE CONSIDERED ONE OF THE TOP 4?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

21 September 2018, by: Thabang Kgeledi<\/h6>\n

<\/p>\n

SHOULD CAPE TOWN CITY BE CONSIDERED ONE OF THE TOP 4?<\/span><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

Guest columnist Thabang Kgeledi @cheez_zoboblog<\/a> of Zobo Football Blog<\/a> uncovers a Twitter beef and then delves into the question behind the spat.<\/strong><\/h4>\n

<\/p>\n

There is nothing that excites me more than Twitter beef. When Cape Town City and Kick Off went at it on the social network last week, my eyes were glued to my cracked iPhone screen.<\/h4>\n

<\/p>\n

Kick Off’s official Twitter account tweeted ‘Which of the ‘Big Three’ made the best goalkeeper signing?’ with a picture that included Mamelodi Sundowns’ Reyaad Pieters, Orlando Pirates’ Brilliant Khuzwayo and Kaizer Chiefs’ Virgil Vries.<\/h4>\n

<\/p>\n

Cape Town City, unhappy their newly signed Peter Leeuwenburgh was not included, responded with a picture of the Dutch stopper with the caption ‘I\u2019m just gonna leave this here for your non-biased readers… ?’.<\/h4>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

I\u2019m just gonna leave this here for your non-biased readers… ? pic.twitter.com\/CkXa5eAdrT<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Cape Town City FC (@CapeTownCityFC) September 6, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n